Skip to content
HM Inspectorate of Prosecution in Scotland
  • Home
  • About us
    • About us
    • Our purpose
    • What we do
    • Who we are
    • Inspection programme
    • Strategic plan
    • Our history
  • News
  • Publications
  • Contact
    • Contact
    • Get in touch
    • Work with us
    • Freedom of Information
    • Complaints
    • FAQs
    • Sign up for alerts
    • Get involved
  1. Home
  2. Publications
  3. Follow-up report on the International Co-operation Unit
  4. Part 2 – Progress against Recommendations

Follow-up report on the International Co-operation Unit

Related Downloads

  • Follow-up report on the International Co-operation Unit
    PDF file, size 243.9 KB
Inspection reports, Follow-up reports

25th August 2015

In March 2014 we published our thematic review of the International Co-operation Unit and made 11 recommendations. This follow-up report will assess the Crown's response to the 2014 review recommendations.

Related Links

  • Thematic report on the International Co-operation Unit

Additional

  • Chief Inspector's Foreword
  • Part 1 – Introduction and Background
  • Part 2 – Progress against Recommendations
  • Glossary
  • Footnotes

  • Chief Inspector's Foreword
  • Part 1 – Introduction and Background
  • Part 2 – Progress against Recommendations
  • Glossary
  • Footnotes

Part 2 – Progress against Recommendations

5. The thematic review made 11 recommendations. All were accepted by Crown Office and Procurator Fiscal Service (COPFS). We have rated the COPFS response to each recommendation as follows:

Achieved - COPFS has completed what was required.
Substantial progress - COPFS has made significant progress in taking forward the recommendation.
In progress - COPFS has taken some action to take forward the recommendation and there is ongoing work aimed at achieving the recommendation.
Not progressed - COPFS cannot demonstrate any progress.

6. The table below sets out the recommendations and the actions taken by COPFS.

No. Recommendations Progress

1

ICU should continue to ensure that a co-ordinated approach is taken to reinforcing its high profile within international circles through a planned timetable of engagements and interactions.

Action Taken

While budgetary pressures have impacted on the ability of ICU to maintain a visible presence in the EU, it has maintained a high profile as evidenced by the following:

  • The Glasgow Herald[1] published an extremely positive in-depth article on the work of ICU;
  • Participation at the International Society for the Reform of Criminal Law (ISRCL) conference entitled "Crossing boundaries, exploitation,
    e-crime evidence and extradition" which was held in Edinburgh in June 2015, chaired by the Solicitor General. The conference, which was attended by members of the judiciary, prosecutors, public officials and legal representatives from across Europe and the Commonwealth, provided a platform for ICU to showcase their work;
  • IAU raise awareness of ICU when delivering training to police officers;
  • ICU has retained the presence of a trainee at Eurojust and members of ICU attend meetings at Eurojust, the European Judicial Network (EJN) and the Academy of European Law (ERA). A senior member of ICU has delivered training at the EJN and ERA;
  • During recent visits to the Philippines and the United Arab Emirates, the ICU head of extradition highlighted the international profile of Scotland and the role of ICU.

Achieved

2

There should be flexibility in the allocation of different types of work within ICU for staff development purposes. All personal development plans should include measures aimed at facilitating a smooth transition for staff moving to other positions within COPFS, including opportunities to retain existing and general skills such as court advocacy.

Action Taken

The following measures have been implemented to provide more diversity for ICU legal staff:

  • Wherever possible, ICU deputes have undertaken general court duties, maintaining advocacy skills;
  • Trainees in ICU are now exposed to all aspects of ICU work;
  • A senior member of ICU now represents the Lord Advocate in extradition appeals before the Appeal Court.

Outstanding

  • It is intended to rotate deputes within ICU to expose them to all aspects of ICU work.

Substantial progress

3

ICU should prepare and publish a defined and agreed strategic purpose and remit for the Unit to clarify and raise awareness of its role within COPFS.

Action Taken

A number of measures have been taken to clarify and raise awareness of the role of ICU. These include:

  • Publication, on the COPFS intranet, of a strategic remit and the objectives of the Unit;
  • Publication, on the COPFS intranet, of a wiki page for ICU containing information and specific guidance on the work of the Unit;
  • An arranged presentation by the UK representative at Eurojust[2] to representatives of COPFS, Her Majesty's Revenue and Customs (HMRC) and Police Scotland. The event is to be opened by the Solicitor General;
  • Regular input from ICU to the Sheriff and Jury and High Court Forums and the training programme for new deputes.

Achieved

4

If the role of International Co‑operation Resource Deputes (ICRDs) is retained, the good practice points identified in part 3 should be implemented.

Action Taken

  • A revised role for the ICRDs, focusing on incoming Mutual Legal Assistance (MLAs), has been agreed;
  • An up-to-date list of ICRDs has been published;
  • Single Points of Contact (SPOCs) at Band G level have been established in each Federation for each of the core functions. All work allocated to ICRDs is copied to the relevant SPOC and a review system has been implemented to highlight any delays to the SPOC and ICU.

Outstanding

  • There are plans to roll out an exchange programme between ICRDs and ICU deputes to enable ICRDs to work in ICU for a week.

Substantial progress

5

An improved IT system with mandatory fields to ensure the accuracy and reliability of ICU data should be introduced.

Action Taken

This recommendation remains under consideration. While various options have been discussed, the viability of a new IT system is constrained by affordability in the current financial climate.

In progress

6

In absence of a new IT system, the recommendations in part 5 (shown below) should be implemented to improve the existing ICU Live system.

  • ICU Live should be re-configured to improve the formatting to make it easier to operate;
  • Systems should be introduced to allow managers to monitor and manage work in the Unit;
  • Functionality of ICU Live should be improved to allow styles to be amended, and redundant styles deleted or alternatively styles should be held elsewhere, such as the Knowledge Bank in an accessible and amendable form;
  • For certain categories of work such as outgoing requests for MLAs, where there is an active investigation, the request and all correspondence should be scanned within the original case on the national IT system to provide a full record of the case in one location.

Action Taken

The existing recording system - ICU Live - has been updated to add revised styles and remove those that are obsolete.

The creation of SPOCs and the introduction of a review process, to monitor ICU work to be progressed by the Federations, will identify and tackle delays.

Outstanding

  • While ICU documents are scanned into ICU Live, they are not incorporated into the electronic criminal case.
  • The functionality of ICU Live has not been developed to make it more user-friendly. The preference of the Head of ICU is to replace ICU Live with a new electronic recording system but this has still to be progressed.

In Progress

7

A comprehensive checklist of the procedures and requirements for local prosecutors seeking to obtain a European Arrest Warrant (EAW) or international warrant through ICU is prepared and publicised by ICU. ICU should issue standard instructions in every such case to the Federation seeking the warrant.

 
  • ICU has published detailed guidance on the requirements for obtaining an EAW or international warrant.
  • ICU liaises with IAU to confirm that COPFS has obtained all relevant information and documentation for all requests for European Arrest and international warrants.

Outstanding

  • While there is detailed guidance available on the intranet on the requirements of obtaining an EAW or international warrant, ICU has not introduced a standard letter of instruction to the Federation seeking the warrant.

Substantial Progress

8

A complete list of all cases in each Federation with an EAW or international warrant is collated by ICU and circulated to each Federation.

 
  • A list of all outstanding warrants (with a note of progress) has been issued by ICU to each Federation.
  • Following a recent instruction, an updated list of all outstanding international warrants will be reconciled monthly with the information held by the Federation SPOCs and IAU.

Achieved

9

Guidance should be published on the requirements to be undertaken prior to the withdrawal of a domestic warrant in cases where there is also a European or international warrant. There should be clarity on who has responsibility for monitoring and reviewing cases with EAWs or international warrants within the Federations.

 
  • Guidance on the requirements to be undertaken prior to the withdrawal of a domestic warrant in cases where there is also a European or international warrant has been published on the intranet, along with an operational reminder.
  • ICU reconciles outstanding international and associated domestic warrants with IAU at regular liaison meetings held every six weeks. This provides a further safeguard ensuring that any domestic warrants withdrawn in error are quickly identified.
  • The Federation SPOCs have responsibility for monitoring and reviewing cases with EAWs or international warrants.

Achieved

10

A process should be introduced to ensure that no domestic warrant relating to a solemn case can be withdrawn without a check being made to see if there is an EAW or international warrant in existence.

 

To raise awareness of existing EAWs and international warrants, an instruction has been issued to the Federation SPOCs to add a note to the COPFS case management system when an EAW or international warrant is requested. ICU is to be notified of any change in the status of any international or European Arrest Warrant. The monthly reconciliation process referred to at recommendation 8 provides a further safeguard.

Achieved

11

Key performance indicators should be introduced as part of a performance framework for the main areas of ICU work.

Action Taken

While KPIs for extradition and MLA work have been agreed and published on the intranet[3], the absence of a reliable recording system prevents effective monitoring of the KPIs.

In Progress

Overview

7. Against a background of financial restraint, ICU has maintained its profile in the international arena taking advantage of various opportunities to highlight their presence and provide assistance. Through a variety of measures, including the publication of a number of guidance notes on dealing with cases with an international dimension, ICU has increased awareness of its role in COPFS. The clarification of the role of the ICRDs and the establishment of SPOCs in the Federations has undoubtedly improved communication and liaison between ICU and the Federations. The proposed exchange programme between the ICRDs and ICU deputes should further enhance this working relationship.

8. The implementation of more robust operational procedures in obtaining, monitoring and reviewing European Arrest and international warrants, in conjunction with regular discussion and reconciliation with IAU, should address the concerns highlighted in the thematic report.

9. As cases and requests to ICU often originate from jurisdictions that do not have access to the national COPFS IT systems, ICU records and monitors their work on ICU Live - a stand-alone electronic recording system. We identified a number of deficiencies with ICU Live in the thematic report and made recommendations designed to improve the quality of data held by ICU. We found that confidence in the electronic recording system used by ICU has not improved. The absence of comprehensive, accurate or reliable data creates a significant management information gap, impacting on the ability of ICU to manage, monitor and prioritise their caseload. It also prevents effective monitoring of KPIs. While we acknowledge financial considerations may constrain the option of acquiring a bespoke IT system, there has been little progress on achieving an alternative solution to address the current inadequacies.

10. Given the relatively small number of cases dealt with by ICU we urge, as a matter of priority, that consideration is given to addressing the deficiencies with the recording and monitoring of data in ICU which in turn will facilitate the effective implementation of KPIs.

Previous
Part 1 – Introduction and Background
Next
Glossary
Site Map
Cookie Policy
Privacy Notice
Accessibility
Contact us
Freedom of Information
Complaints
© 2025 HM Inspectorate of Prosecution in Scotland

We use the necessary cookies to make our site work. We'd also like to set analytics cookies that help us make improvements by measuring how you use the site. These will be set only if you accept.

For more detailed information about the cookies we use, see our Cookie Policy.