Skip to content
HM Inspectorate of Prosecution in Scotland
  • Home
  • About us
    • About us
    • Our purpose
    • What we do
    • Who we are
    • Inspection programme
    • Strategic plan
    • Our history
  • News
  • Publications
  • Contact
    • Contact
    • Get in touch
    • Work with us
    • Freedom of Information
    • Complaints
    • FAQs
    • Sign up for alerts
    • Get involved
  1. Home
  2. Publications
  3. Thematic report on Crown Office and Procurator Fiscal Service's response on race issues
  4. Recommendations

Thematic report on Crown Office and Procurator Fiscal Service's response on race issues

Related Downloads

  • Thematic Report On Crown Office And Procurator Fiscal Service's Response On Race Issues
    PDF file, size 7.0 MB
Inspection reports

21st March 2005

This is the first thematic review of HM Inspectorate of Prosecution In Scotland. The aim is to present a national picture about the Crown Office and Procurator Fiscal Service's response on race issues. This review reflects the high profile which race and equality issues have in the criminal justice system. It therefore attempts to take a holistic view of the whole operation of COPFS including its strategic approach and measuring the Department's compliance with the Race Relations (Amendment) Act 2000.

Additional

  • Executive summary
  • Introduction
  • Chapter 1. Background
  • Chapter 2. Race Crime
  • Chapter 3. Interpreters
  • Chapter 4. Employment
  • Chapter 5. Consultation
  • Chapter 6. Race Equality Scheme
  • Conclusions
  • Recommendations
  • Chronology
  • Annex A
  • Annex B Interpreters Postal Survey
  • Annex C Lord Advocate's Guidelines
  • Appendix A Reference Group Members
  • Appendix B List of organisations consulted
  • Footnotes

  • Executive summary
  • Introduction
  • Chapter 1. Background
  • Chapter 2. Race Crime
  • Chapter 3. Interpreters
  • Chapter 4. Employment
  • Chapter 5. Consultation
  • Chapter 6. Race Equality Scheme
  • Conclusions
  • Recommendations
  • Chronology
  • Annex A
  • Annex B Interpreters Postal Survey
  • Annex C Lord Advocate's Guidelines
  • Appendix A Reference Group Members
  • Appendix B List of organisations consulted
  • Footnotes

Recommendations

Recommendation 1
That Crown Office begins to monitor and evaluate use of Language Line as a tool to anticipate changes in language needs.

Recommendation 2
All precognition staff should receive training on working with interpreters.

Recommendation 3
That the performance of individual interpreters should be monitored regularly. It may make sense that this be carried out by the interpreting agencies themselves.

Recommendation 4
That Crown Office, through WGIT raises and takes forward with all criminal justice partners training on the use of interpreters with consideration being given to the development of a protocol on the use of interpreters in court.

Recommendation 5
Revision of the code of conduct for interpreters: at present the code instructs that an interpreter should not enter into discussion with the witness other than to confirm a language/dialect match, however, witnesses are in an alien environment and it would be helpful if that time spent confirming the match be extended in order to pass vital information on to the witness who may be at court for the best part of the day.

Recommendation 6
That in any revision of the Lord Advocate's Guidelines on reporting racist crime consideration be given to suggesting that the use of child witnesses under 16 to interpret for parents is inappropriate in terms of both the interests of the child and in the interests of the case.

Recommendation 7
That all interpreters involved in the criminal justice process be vetted to the level of standard disclosure.

Recommendation 8
We recommend that active analysis of applicants for employment, training and promotion should be put in place.

Recommendation 9
We recommend that active analysis of training received by staff should be put in place.

Recommendation 10
We strongly recommend that publication of monitoring data be taken forward at the very earliest opportunity and we support the use of the COPFS website as a forum via which to publish.

Recommendation 11
We would, however, recommend that the guidance on the collection of race crime statistics be beefed up to make it clear who is expected to read reports and submit statistics.

Recommendation 12
That the Department heightens its public profile, nationally and at local level.

Previous
Conclusions
Next
Chronology
Site Map
Cookie Policy
Privacy Notice
Accessibility
Contact us
Freedom of Information
Complaints
© 2025 HM Inspectorate of Prosecution in Scotland

We use the necessary cookies to make our site work. We'd also like to set analytics cookies that help us make improvements by measuring how you use the site. These will be set only if you accept.

For more detailed information about the cookies we use, see ourĀ Cookie Policy.